by .... on 27 May 2006, 16:13
Wales 2-1 Trinidad & Tobago. I thought T&T were the better team and controlled the game throughout the majority of the second half. Their passing was much slicker than Wales (which you'd expect, given that Wales had 7 under 21 players out on the field at the end), and they held on to the ball for long periods of time, but the finishing and the final pass left a lot to be desired. They did not create many clear chances on goal despite having the lion's share of possession.
Furthermore, I was not impressed with the snail-like pace at which they played. You have to pass and play a lot quicker than that at the top level.
I'd also have expected better defending against the Welsh strikers, who gave up a lot in height to the Trinidadian defenders. The big guy Lawrence in particular really messed up for Earnshaw's first goal. You'd expect someone of 6 feet 7 inches to be a little better in the air, but he missed the cross completely, and then lost Earnshaw. He didn't react quickly enough, and that's a very amateur thing to do IMO.
Anyway, T&T were unfortunate at the end, but they need to play a lot better than that against Sweden, Paraguay and England. They certainly need to defend better. I have to say that while I think they WILL play a lot better in the WC than in this meaningless friendly, I do not think the quality of the players (for the most part, Scottish league or lower level English league) will be enough to even garner them a point come the World Cup. .
Perhaps I'm wrong, but when was the last time a team with mostly second and third division players was good enough to compete at World Cup level? Never is probably the answer.